The University of Notre Dame is deep in the midst of developing a campus-wide strategic framework, a task it takes on every 10 years to set a path for its future. This framework “will guide Notre Dame to even higher levels of excellence and impact in accord with its mission,” University President Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., said Tuesday (Sept. 20) during his annual address to the faculty.
The process takes into account plans and aspirations of the colleges, schools and other units to leverage strengths, identify fresh opportunities, encourage interdisciplinary collaboration and make investments with transformative potential, he said.
The process will lead to a , rather than a plan, according to Father Jenkins. It won’t produce a road map that the University will follow without alteration for the next decade. “As they say in the boxing world, ‘Everyone’s got a plan until they get punched in the mouth,’” he said.
Instead, priorities and key initiatives will be identified on which to begin work, and over time, revisions and adjustments will be required, he said.
The work involves , each focusing on an academic theme, with 73 faculty members serving as committee members. Most of the groups will submit reports by the end of this calendar year. The committee reports will be woven together into a comprehensive strategic framework by John McGreevy, the Charles and Jill Fischer Provost, working in collaboration with others. The results will be submitted to the Board of Trustees.
Father Jenkins also discussed the University’s goals in the areas of diversity, equity and inclusion. A 2021 Notre Dame Trustees’ Task Force Report, “,” provided a charge for progress.
Father Jenkins noted that this fall’s incoming undergraduate class is the most diverse in University history: 40 percent of the class are students of color or international students (up from 39 percent last year); 9 percent are Black or African American; 13 percent are Hispanic/Latino; 1 percent are Native American; and 10 percent are Asian or Pacific Islander. The University also is making progress in enrolling applicants who are first-generation college students or from limited socioeconomic means: 19 percent of this year’s incoming class are Pell Grant-eligible or first-generation college students.
On July 1, Rev. Hugh Page — a professor of theology and Africana studies, former dean of the First Year of 91Ƶ and a former associate provost — assumed the newly created position of vice president for institutional transformation.
As part of the strategic framework process, an advisory committee has been formed focusing on . The University is continuing to invest in support programs to help all students flourish and in December will start construction on a new diversity and inclusion center in LaFortune Student Center.
University leaders are making progress in hiring diverse faculty, a task that has been helped by the colleges and departments, Father Jenkins said. “Though we can be proud of recent efforts, more needs to be done,” he said.
Father Jenkins described how the University last winter engaged Edelman, a global communications firm, for a comprehensive study of Notre Dame’s reputation and public perception. Consistent with previous studies, the survey showed that “while Notre Dame is well-known and well-regarded for its Catholic mission and football, its research and global presence are less well-known,” he said. Administrators and faculty must work together to help spread the word of the important work that professors are doing in research, teaching and global engagement, as well as the University’s efforts with diversity and inclusion, he said.
Father Jenkins reminded faculty of Notre Dame’s policy requiring employees to report misconduct of any kind that they become aware of on campus. He noted some other universities in recent years have faced major scandals involving such matters as dishonest admissions and serial sexual abusers.
Notre Dame makes it simple for individuals to — including ways to make a report anonymously. “If you see something, say something. Do it because it serves the University. Most importantly, do so because it is the right thing — the ethical thing — to do, and it will make our community better,” he said.
Father Jenkins reported that during the summer Notre Dame closed its COVID-19 Response Unit — the group that was created to conduct campus virus testing and arrange quarantine and isolation during the height of the pandemic. “With greatly reduced and more manageable cases, we were able to move these operations back to our University Health Services for students and our Wellness Center for staff and faculty, offices that in normal times care for the health and well-being of campus,” he said.
While the University remains , University leaders welcome the opportunity to devote the majority of their time to teaching, research and inquiry, he said. He thanked faculty and staff for their efforts to keep the campus open for in-person classes and prevent spread of the virus. “We had many pandemic heroes on this campus,” he said.
Father Jenkins also announced that the theme of the 2022-23 Notre Dame Forum is “War and Peace.” There will be a variety of lectures and other events designed to encourage campus discussion on the topic, including an featuring both professional actors and members of the campus community.
Read the full text of the speech at .
Margaret Fosmoe is associate editor of Notre Dame Magazine.
]]>SOUTH BEND — A new art museum, four more residence halls, several new academic buildings and new athletic fields are in the University of Notre Dame’s future.
There also will be a lush lawn rolled out at the university’s front door.
Those are a few of the improvements included in Notre Dame’s master campus plan.
A total of $300 million to $400 million in campus building and renovation work is expected during the next five years, said John Affleck-Graves, Notre Dame’s executive vice president.
Don’t expect any dramatic architectural changes. Traditional collegiate Gothic will continue to be the style for future campus buildings.“Our alumni, and our students and the administration are really comfortable with collegiate Gothic,” Affleck-Graves said. “It’s not that it’s right for everybody, but we think for Notre Dame, it’s important that there’s a consistency.”
Scheduled projects
The following projects are under way or soon to start.
p. A road leading to Hesburgh Library will remain, but will be redesigned to add more short-term and disabled parking spaces.
More than 350 trees and other landscaping will be added along the former Juniper route. The work will be completed by August.
p. Some of the paths will lead to Eddy Street, where a “college town” retail-residential-office development named Eddy Street Commons is planned on land owned by Notre Dame. The developer is Kite Realty Trust Group of Indianapolis.
Notre Dame Commons will have the look and feel of a park, and is intended for use by both campus and community residents. A terrace on the DeBartolo Performing Arts Center’s south side will lead onto the Great Lawn.
Future projects
p. Fundraising should be complete within six months and construction could begin in the next year, Affleck-Graves said.
Fundraising stage
The following future projects are planned and funds are being sought. Construction is not yet scheduled.
p. Notre Dame currently has about 8,000 undergraduates, and 6,400 live on campus. The university has no plans to significantly increase the size of its student body, Affleck-Graves said. The additional dorms will allow the university to restore study lounges in some of the residence halls that have been converted to student rooms, he said. There is no plan to build campus apartments for undergraduates.
TopicID: 22589
]]>SOUTH BEND — Thomas G. Burish believes that the University of Notre Dame can build its reputation as a Catholic graduate and research institution, and maintain its excellence in teaching.
“Becoming a greater research institution should not and need not interfere with its teaching mission. If it did, it seems to me that it would be too great a price to pay,” said Burish, who will become Notre Dame’s next provost.
“I think it can be done, and at the same time retain the strength of its Catholic character and mission,” he said during an interview Saturday in South Bend.
Burish, 55, is leaving the presidency of Washington and Lee University to take Notre Dame’s second-highest ranking administrative job. He previously served as provost at Vanderbilt University for 10 years. He also has credentials as a professor and researcher in clinical psychology.
Burish didn’t initially apply for the Notre Dame provost’s job.
When he became president at Washington and Lee in 2002, he thought he’d finish his career there. He never imagined he’d return to Notre Dame, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in 1972.
Burish and his wife, Pamela, have two sons. The couple visited Notre Dame in recent years while their younger son, Brent, earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees here.
While attending his son’s commencement here in May, Burish was approached by the Rev. John I. Jenkins, who became Notre Dame’s president July 1.
“I have great admiration for Father Jenkins and I have a great sense of excitement about his vision for the university and for its future,” Burish said. He expects to begin here in late August or early September.
Burish grew up in Wisconsin in a strong Catholic family. He attended a small Catholic college in his home state as a freshman, then transferred to Notre Dame as a sophomore. He was drawn to Notre Dame by its academic reputation and its Catholic nature.
Burish became interested in psychology during college.
As an undergraduate, he did research on mental retardation with two psychology professors, Thomas Whitman and John Borkowski, both of whom are still on the faculty. The project led to publication of an article, with Burish listed as a co-author.
That research, which involved working with children at Logan Center, convinced Burish to pursue an academic career.
“He was an exceptional student,” Whitman recalled. “He was not only bright, but extremely curious and extremely interested in psychology. And dedicated to doing good work.”
Burish’s first task will involve getting caught up on how Notre Dame has changed and grown.
He sees the primary job of the provost as creating a setting in which faculty can excel. “Ultimately, no university can be better than its faculty,” he said.
Burish has long been active in cancer research and policy. He got started while at Vanderbilt when a colleague asked him to study the impact of stress on cancer patients.
He’s currently chair of the American Cancer Society’s national board of directors.
TopicID: 12405
]]>TopicID: 10874
]]>Willingham was given no assurances when hired that he would have a five-year minimum to prove himself as head football coach, Jenkins, the university’s president-elect, said Wednesday in a meeting with the Faculty Board on Athletics.
“Although the program was strong in terms of its integrity and graduation rate, our success on the football field has not been up to our expectations,” the president-elect told the faculty board members, according to a copy of Jenkins’ prepared remarks obtained by The Tribune.
The meeting came a day after the Rev. Edward A. Malloy, the current university president, met with the same board. Malloy has publicly said he disagreed with the decision to fire the coach and was embarrassed to be Notre Dame’s president in the days following the firing.
The timing of the firing put Malloy in the position of being blamed for and having to defend a decision he opposed, Jenkins said, thus prompting Malloy’s public statement disavowing any responsibility for the firing.
“Father Malloy and I have spoken about this matter, and we each regret and have apologized for any difficulty each of us has caused the other. … We both deeply regret any damage we have caused the university,” Jenkins said, stating the two are committed to working together for the good of the university in the coming months.
Jenkins will become president of Notre Dame after Malloy steps down June 30.
The Faculty Board on Athletics includes seven faculty members elected by fellow faculty, four members appointed by the university president and four ex officio members — including the athletic director, Kevin White, and the head of academic student services, Patrick Holmes.
At least one board member — Steve Fallon, an elected representative from the College of Arts&Letters — expressed concern in recent days about the board being bypassed in the decision process that led to Willingham’s firing.
Fallon declined comment Wednesday. He and other members referred all questions to the board’s chair, law school professor Fernand “Tex” Dutile.
Dutile confirmed the board met with Malloy and Jenkins on separate days, but declined to provide any details. He said board members will meet again soon to discuss the matter.
“Until the board meets again, I don’t want to comment,” he said.
Jenkins and Malloy each have declined Tribune requests for personal interviews since Willingham was fired.
Jenkins said a number of high-level administrators at the university came to him in late fall to express concern about the football program. The team suffered a 41-10 loss at Southern California on Nov. 27, finishing the regular season with a 6-5 record.
Jenkins said the concerns expressed and the upcoming football recruiting season prompted him to urge the meeting that included himself, Malloy, three other administrators and two members of the board of trustees. Willingham was fired the next day.
*NOTE:
December 15, 2004
I will respond to your concerns as honestly and straightforwardly as I can, though I must respect certain confidentialities. These arise from university policy not to comment on the details of personnel decisions. However, I think I can respond to your main concerns.
I have been asked about the process that led to the decision to dismiss Coach Willingham. I can describe the parts of the process in which I was personally involved.
The decision to retain or dismiss a coach lies with the Athletic Director and ultimately with the president of the university. We are in an unusual position this year, because we have both a president and president-elect. It has been and remains my understanding that, although Fr. Malloy is president and holds authority for decisions, it is appropriate for me to be involved in decisions which will influence future years when I will be president. Although no formal agreement between Fr. Malloy and myself has been articulated about specifically which decisions I will be involved in, we have been operating successfully with an informal, good faith understanding that my voice will be brought in and influence decisions on matters relating to the period when I will be president. He has on numerous decisions asked for my input or simply deferred the decision to me. This informal arrangement has been the basis for a working relationship which has been up to this point cordial and unproblematic.
In recent weeks a number of high-level administrators at the university came to me expressing concern about the football program. We had had mixed success on the field during the past two seasons, and the concern was about the trajectory of what is clearly the most visible athletic program in the university. Although the program was strong in terms of its integrity and graduation rate, our success on the football field has not been up to our expectations.
At the end of the regular season (November 27th), these concerns were brought to a head. Because December through February is so critical to recruiting for a football program, and because clarity about the future is so critical to recruiting, it was clear a decision had to be made quickly either to retain and support the head coach, or dismiss him. __ Because the decision facing the university was about who should be coach in the 2005 season and beyond, the period when I would be president, I felt it appropriate for me to have significant input on this decision. Consequently, on Monday morning, November 29th I went to Fr. Malloy’s office to discuss this situation, and urged that we should have a conversation with other leaders of the university about it. Fr. Malloy made it clear that he did not favor making a change, but expressed a willingness to have such a discussion. Consequently, that afternoon Fr. Malloy, myself, Nathan Hatch, John Affleck-Graves and Kevin White gathered to discuss this matter. Because this was a decision about such a high-profile issue, we included Patrick McCartan, chairman of the Board of Trustees, and Philip Purcell, Chair of the Athletic Affairs Committee of the Board of Trustees.
All parties in that meeting expressed their views. Fr. Malloy made it clear that he opposed a change of head coach, but, because the decision was for the 2005 season when I would be president, he would accede to the recommendation of the group. After sleeping on the issue for one night, the university administrators decided, with the concurrence of the trustees, to make a change. In accord with his position that he would not stand in the way of such a decision, Fr. Malloy accepted the recommendation of the group.
I will now make four points about this decision and the process which led to it.
In closing, I want to say something about the relationship between Fr. Malloy and myself. As is obvious to all, he and I disagreed about the dismissal of Coach Willingham, although he deferred to me on this decision. Although I did not fully appreciate it at the time, this put Fr. Malloy in the very difficult position of being blamed for and having to defend a decision he strongly opposed. It was for this reason, I believe, that Fr. Malloy made some widely reported comments, which put me and the university in a difficult position. Fr. Malloy and I have spoken about this matter, and we each regret and have apologized for any difficulty each of us has caused the other. It is not easy for anyone to operate in the glare of such intense media interest, speculation and criticism. We both deeply regret any damage we have caused the university. I am confident, however, that we are committed to working together for the good of the university in coming months.
Thank you for your time. I will take questions.
TopicID: 8629
]]>SOUTH BEND — As president-elect of the University of Notre Dame, the Rev. John I. Jenkins has a threefold vision for the future.
His plans for Notre Dame include maintaining its traditional excellence in undergraduate teaching, improving it as a key research and graduate institution, and maintaining the university’s Catholic identity.
“I really want to retain those three points and enhance each one of them, without sacrificing the others,” Jenkins said Friday.
The priest believes firmly that the goals are simultaneously attainable.
“We are the most prominent institution that tries to retain its religious character — Catholic character — while being a distinguished university,” he said. “That’s not easy, but I think it makes us much more interesting. And I think that is the calling of this institution.”
Jenkins, 50, in late April was elected Notre Dame’s next president by the university’s board of trustees.
He will become the 17th president in June 2005, when the Rev. Edward A. Malloy steps down after 18 years in the job.
Jenkins said Notre Dame can maintain its teaching strength while growing as a graduate and research institution.
“A university doesn’t have a responsibility only to its students but also to the wider culture, to enter into debates about science, ethical values, religious questions and cultural questions,” he said.
“Unless Notre Dame is doing high-level work in those areas, it will not contribute to those debates,” Jenkins said. “And I think society would lose an extremely important voice in those debates.”
Jenkins felt his calling to the priesthood in his early 20s and was ordained a Holy Cross priest in 1983. Being a priest is the central focus of his life.
“I do see my life as flowing out of that vocation,” he said.
Jenkins, a faculty member and former vice president and associate provost, is settling into a new office on the third floor of the Main Building. He’ll occupy that office for the next 13 months, until he becomes president.
The board of trustees gave Jenkins specific responsibilities as president-elect, including some budget matters and working with the development office on a new capital campaign.
He’ll be working closely during the next year with Malloy and with John Affleck-Graves, the newly named executive vice president.
Jenkins also is making travel plans. Although he won’t reveal specific names, he’ll be visiting presidents of some other major universities and key members of the Catholic Church in the United States.
The president-elect is a respected scholar and author of the 1997 book “Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas.”
Jenkins earned bachelor’s and master’s degree in philosophy at Notre Dame in 1976 and 1978. He later earned a master of divinity degree and a licentiate in sacred theology from the Jesuit 91Ƶ of Theology, Berkeley, Calif., and bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Oxford University.
Jenkins specializes in ancient philosophy, medieval philosophy and the philosophy of religion.
Jenkins is a “genuine Catholic intellectual,” said W. David Solomon, a Notre Dame philosophy professor. He taught Jenkins as both an undergraduate and graduate student and has worked with him as a faculty colleague in the philosophy department.
“He was a superb student as an undergraduate, very thoughtful from early on,” Solomon said. “He’s exactly what we look for at Notre Dame: a commitment to undergraduate teaching and scholarship at the highest level.”
Alasdair MacIntyre, another Notre Dame philosophy professor, echoed that assessment of Jenkins’ academic profile. The priest’s book was a “particularly nuanced and clear statement of themes in Aquinas’ work,” he said.
Jenkins was on sabbatical for the 2003-04 academic year, working at the University of Chicago on a planned book about St. Augustine.
The manuscript is half finished. Because of his new commitments, Jenkins said he may have to turn his work into a series of articles rather than a full book.
However, intellectual pursuits don’t occupy all of Jenkins’ time.
He’s a reader who appreciates P.D. James mystery novels in addition to philosophical works.
Jenkins stays fit by running in the warmer months and swimming in the winter. He ran his first marathon last fall in Chicago, finishing “somewhere in the middle,” he said.
He was a member of the swim team in high school and, as a Notre Dame undergraduate, was involved in intramural sports and the philosophy club.
Jenkins enjoys college athletics and attends all Notre Dame football games. He isn’t ready to provide any details about his plans for the athletics program.
“I think we have a wonderful tradition here of athletic excellence combined with a commitment to integrity, and a concern for students as students,” he said.
As president, Malloy changed the university’s management structure to have Notre Dame’s athletic director report directly to him. Jenkins declined to discuss whether he plans to keep it that way.
Jenkins’ current home is Dillon Hall, a men’s residence hall. For 2004-2005, he’ll be living in Keenan Hall, another men’s dormitory.
Jenkins plans to continue Malloy’s tradition of the university president living in a student residence hall.
“I enjoy it because it allows you to interact with the students away from your administrative duties and your teaching. It allows me to work as a priest,” he said.
Jenkins won’t be teaching a class during 2004-2005, but he hopes to teach a freshman seminar while president.
Jenkins plans to continue Notre Dame’s efforts to be involved in the community and to welcome local residents to campus. The university’s efforts include establishing the Center for the Homeless, the Robinson Community Learning Center and encouraging employees to build new homes in the northeast neighborhood.
Next fall’s opening of the DeBartolo Center for the Performing Arts on campus will further enhance the community, providing many opportunities for local residents to visit campus for events. “The whole area of arts and performance is going to take off,” he said.
Notre Dame students and employees will continue to reach into the community and work with its residents, he said.
“I think our advancement as a university depends upon the advancement of South Bend,” Jenkins said. “It’s critical that we develop strong, positive relationships with the South Bend community and work together to make this a wonderful place to live, so people will want to come and live here.”
TopicID: 5300
]]>By the numbers: Notre Dame employment * Annual payroll: $290 million
Source: University of Notre Dame
The full report is available online at: .
TopicID: 3936
]]>TopicID: 406
]]>TopicID: 3492
]]>