91ÊÓƵ

Three Notre Dame Law 91ÊÓƵ faculty members were cited in two U.S. Supreme Court cases on Wednesday (June 26).

, the John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law, was cited by Associate Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the court in Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas. Professors and were cited by Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch in a concurring opinion in Kisor v. Wilkie.

Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association dealt with the constitutionality of residency requirements for retail liquor sales. In his opinion, Alito cited Cushman’s work, "," to demonstrate the important role the Commerce Clause has played in the economic history of the country.

The court in Kisor reconsidered the so-called Auer doctrine of administrative law, which governs administrative agencies’ interpretations of their own regulations. In his concurring opinion, Gorsuch cited Pojanowski’s work in "," which argues that Auer rests on a misunderstanding of its originating case, the 1945 decision Bowles v. Seminole Rock, and that Seminole Rock implies a less-deferential standard of rule and Congress likely codified this less-deferential approach in legislation on judicial review of agency action.

Kozel, who also serves as Notre Dame Law 91ÊÓƵ’s associate dean for faculty development and directs the , was also cited by Gorsuch. He cited Kozel’s article, "," which discusses the precedential effect of judicial decisions that set out wide-ranging principles of interpretation for future cases.

Originally published by Denise Wager at on June 28.