91视频

Richard Garnett

Notre Dame Law 91视频

Office
3117 Eck Hall Of Law
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Phone
574-631-6981
Email
rgarnett@nd.edu

Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law
Concurrent Professor of Political Science

  • Death penalty
  • Free speech
  • 91视频 choice
  • Catholic social thought
  • Church/state relations
  • Religion in the public square
  • Free exercise of religion
  • Federalism and criminal law
  • Supreme court
  • Criminal defense
  • Religious liberty
  • Education reform

Garnett’s 91视频

Garnett in the News

Richard Garnett teaches and writes about constitutional and criminal law at the University of Notre Dame, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1999. Before that, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. and clerked for the late Chief Justice of the United States, William H. Rehnquist.

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl Professor of Law and director of the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law 91视频.

Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard W. Garnett said in a statement that even if there had been an appetite to revisit same-sex marriage, this was not the case the justices would have used. To get to the marriage issue, the justices would first have had to rule that Davis, a government employee, had a constitutional right to ignore a law she disagreed with — a position the court would be unlikely to take, legal analysts noted.

"Although various commentators and activists have spent weeks claiming that a vehicle for overturning Obergefell was being considered by the justices, no informed Court observers ever thought that the Court would grant review in this case," said Notre Dame Law professor Richard W. Garnett. "The case does not actually present, in a square and clean way, the question the coverage has suggested it does. The attention focused on this minor, factbound petition tells us more about the ongoing campaign to stir up public feeling regarding the Court than it does about live constitutional questions."

But Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard Garnett said Davis’ appeal was a “minor, fact-bound petition” that didn’t clearly give the justices the opportunity to revisit their 2015 decision. "Although various commentators and activists have spent weeks claiming that a vehicle for overturning Obergefell was being considered by the justices, no informed court observers ever thought that the court would grant review in this case,” he said. “The case does not actually present, in a square and clean way, the question the coverage has suggested it does.”

Even so, Richard W. Garnett, a law professor and the director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society, said the petition from Ms. Davis was always a long shot that attracted outsized media attention. “The case does not actually present, in a square and clean way, the question the coverage has suggested it does,” he said in a statement. The coverage, he said, “tells us more about the ongoing campaign to stir up public feeling regarding the court than it does about live constitutional questions.”

Gray Media (+12 others)

Video

“They shackled him to a chair and shaved his head. And this conduct clearly violated the federal religious freedom statute,” said Richard Garnett, a University of Notre Dame law professor who joined other scholars in filing an amicus brief in support of Landor.

Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, told OSV News, “Although various commentators and activists have spent weeks claiming that a vehicle for overturning Obergefell was being considered by the justices, no informed court observers ever thought that the court would grant review in this case. The case does not actually present, in a square and clean way, the question the coverage has suggested it does,” he said. “The attention focused on this minor, fact-bound petition tells us more about the ongoing campaign to stir up public feeling regarding the court than it does about live constitutional questions.”

SCOTUS Blog

Rights and Responsibilities is a recurring series by Richard Garnett on legal education, the role of the courts in our constitutional structure, and the law of religious freedom and free expression.

The primary legal question at play in Chiles v. Salazar is a “doctrinal question of free speech law,” says Rick Garnett, who heads the Program on Church, State, and Society at University of Notre Dame’s law school in Indiana. “Namely, ‘What’s the distinction between regulations of conduct and regulations of expression?’” The court, he says, has a deep well of case law to draw upon in making its ruling.

As always, the Supreme Court’s docket so far includes many cases that raise interesting, important and tricky legal questions,” Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, told OSV News.

Prof. Richard W. Garnett, Notre Dame Law 91视频

Houston Chronicle

Richard Garnett, professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, says it isn’t illegal for Paxton to highlight a specific verse from the Bible. “Even if it's kind of an endorsement of a particular religion, like, ‘Hey, I'm a Baptist, and I really like the Lord's Prayer,’ that's  permissible,” Garnett said. “It’s not coercing anybody to engage in anything because he's just kind of expressing his own views.”

Navigating the tension between religious expression and the protection of other rights is “tricky,” said Richard Garnett, a law professor who leads the University of Notre Dame’s Church, State & Society program.

 

 

SCOTUS Blog

Richard Garnett teaches and writes about constitutional and criminal law at the University of Notre Dame, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1999. Before that, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. and clerked for the late Chief Justice of the United States, William H. Rehnquist.

Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society, said in comments shared with OSV News, “Given the precedents of both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals, it is not particularly surprising that a federal trial court would block this Texas law. A similar Louisiana law had already been rejected in the same federal circuit, and lower federal courts should follow, as best they can, the Supreme Court’s precedents,” he said. “At the same time, this particular opinion is among the most rhetorically bizarre and injudicious ones on record, and it is riddled with historical errors and irrelevancies. Before too long, the Supreme Court will have to clarify its doctrine in this area.”

However, Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, told OSV News, “It is very unlikely that the Court is going to review a jury’s damages verdict in a case with these facts. Among other things, it is not the case that the First Amendment’s religious-liberty guarantees authorize or protect the actions taken by Ms. Davis,” he said.

Most of the religious cases Richard Garnett teaches in his classes at the University of Notre Dame Law 91视频 involve smaller religious communities, including Jehovah’s Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists. “The story of religious freedom in America has developed through cases involving members of minority religions,” Garnett said.

Richard W. Garnett, a law professor at Notre Dame who specializes in law and religion, said that the policy would serve as a reminder of a 2023 Supreme Court decision in favor of a postal carrier who rejected working on Sunday to deliver Amazon packages, which broadened the understanding of how workplaces must adapt to religious requests made by employees. 

Prof. Richard W. Garnett, Notre Dame Law 91视频

Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor Richard Garnett, who has supported the religious claimants in the three cases, described the court's trend over the past few decades as having "rejected an interpretation of the Constitution that would exclude religion from public life or prevent reasonable cooperation and accommodation."

"The claim in this case is not that government schools are allowed to be Catholic or religious. This is a claim that, in Oklahoma, charter schools are contractors," said Rick Garnett, a constitutional law professor at the University of Notre Dame.

"The unifying thread is the idea that once the government decides to open up a program and to distribute benefits or to contract with people, it can't single out religious people or institutions for special disadvantage," said Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频 who directs its Program on Church, State and Society.

“When the government seeks to instruct students about value-laden sexuality and gender issues in a way that contradicts their parents’ religious instruction, without telling the parents or providing an opt-out, the parents’ First Amendment rights have been burdened,” said the brief from legal experts, including University of Virginia law professor Douglas Laycock and Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor Richard Garnett.

Pioneered by Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett, a conservative scholar I admire and respect, the belief descends from the medieval Catholic teaching championing the “freedom of the church,” or libertas ecclesiae. In other words, it’s an aspirational Catholic governance ideal, not an argument derived from the Constitution that belongs in the Supreme Court.

"It's a mistake to think of the United States as a 'Christian nation,' even though, of course, Christians and Christianity have, from the beginning, played important roles in American law and life," University of Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett told me. "I have always argued that 'separation' of church and state in the American tradition was not supposed to mean French-style 'laïcité' or a 'naked public square,' or a 'no religious arguments in policy debates' rule. It means: (a) political and religious authority are 'differentiated,' (b) but differentiated things may 'cooperate' and (c) government may and should 'accommodate' religious believers." 

Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, said the case “raises interesting and important questions both about the freedom of speech and about the federal government’s national security powers.”

“Over the last several decades, the Supreme Court’s decisions involving cooperation with public schools have made it pretty clear in a way that wasn’t true in the 70s and 80s, but now it is quite clear that the First Amendment permits governments to cooperate with religious schools when it comes to education that doesn’t violate the separation of church and state, so long as the programs are properly designed,” said Rick Garnett, director of Notre Dame Law 91视频’s Program on Church, State & Society and who is involved in the legal case for the religious charter school in Oklahoma.  

Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard W. Garnett, a Supreme Court expert and concurrent political science professor, said in written comments that “there are interesting questions to consider about the power of Congress to regulate the Supreme Court’s justices and practices, and about proposals regarding term limits, retirement ages, and disclosure rules.”

Even if Congress had the will to pass the sort of legislation Mr. Biden is proposing, it would raise significant legal questions, said Richard W. Garnett, who teaches constitutional law at Notre Dame.

While the cases are complicated, said First Amendment expert and Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor Richard W. Garnett, the justices were clear on two things:

“It could well be that some of these developments are appropriate and some of them go too far,” said Richard Garnett, a law professor and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society.

Relevant Radio

Audio

Dr. Rick Garnett of the University of Notre Dame stopped by to discuss recent SCOTUS rulings (18:35).

Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频 and Director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society, discusses Louisiana passing the first law in four decades, requiring that the Ten Commandments be posted in every public classroom.

Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard W. Garnett, who is the director of the school’s Program on Church, State & Society, said, in comments to Fox News Digital, that the Supreme Court justices understand the distinction between church and state doesn’t require the exclusion of expressions of faith from the public square.

The justices themselves "understand well, even if Mr. Trump does not, that their role is to interpret the law, not to protect any particular public figure's personal interests," said Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频.

In friend-of-the court briefs filed in support of Vitagliano, legal experts including Richard Garnett, a Notre Dame professor of law and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State and Society, stressed the widespread disagreement on the Hill decision. 

Rick Garnett, a professor at the University of Notre Dame’s law school, said he expects litigation to continue.

“I think the justices, in a sense – they were ships passing in the night,” said Richard Garnett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame who signed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the aspiring wedding web designer who prevailed in the case. “They disagreed about what the case was about.”

But the First Amendment also guarantees the “free exercise” of religion and so prohibits anti-religious discrimination by governments, argueNicole Stelle Garnett and Richard Garnett of Notre Dame Law 91视频, who helped the the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa with their charter school application.

Reason Magazine

"The American constitutional system "protects private actors," says Notre Dame law professor Richard W. Garnett, while constraining how government officials can exercise their power.

The Kansas City Star

“People are called traditionalists because of their aesthetic tastes,” said Richard Garnett, the director of the Program on Church, State and Society at Notre Dame University. “And that’s given some political baggage like they’re hostile to the pope or they don’t believe in the Second Vatican Council and that’s a mistake.”

 

Audio

Professor Richard Garnett of Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments in the case of a postal worker who refused to work on Sundays and his request for a religious accomodation. 

Rick Garnett, a law professor from the University of Notre Dame, told the Washington Examiner the court's three Democratic appointees might prefer Congress to address any outstanding questions in Hardison.

Rick Garnett, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, told OSV News that although the FBI retracted the memo, "that it was ever composed is troubling."

First Things

Nicole Stelle Garnett is the John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law 91视频. Richard W. Garnett is professor of law and concurrent professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame. 

Richard Garnett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana, and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State, and Society, told The Tablet that the court’s decision to hear this case is welcome news because it “provides the court with an opportunity to revisit, and correct, a 1977 ruling that most observers, across the political spectrum, agree was wrongly decided.”

Deseret News

“As I see it (or, as I heard it), many of the justices were asking the advocates to help them identify lines and limits. It is unlikely that any of the justices believes that public-accommodations laws never implicate First Amendment rights and also unlikely that any of them believes that they always do. What, then, is the principle, factor, or consideration that judges and regulators can use to distinguish between impermissible and permissible uses of such laws?” wrote Rick Garnett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, to me in an email.

“One reason why I think the restaurant story is getting a lot of attention is because it happened on basically the same day as the arguments in the Supreme Court about the web designer,” Richard W. Garnett, a Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society, tells TODAY.com.

Rick Garnett, a professor at University of Notre Dame, the Law 91视频 who clerked at the Supreme Court for then-Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, called the lack of a GOP nominee on the First Circuit "a pretty striking data point that the First Circuit is dramatically out of sync, not only with the Supreme Court, but with the other circuit courts at the moment."

Audio

First Amendment law expert Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses Yeshiva University temporarily suspending all undergraduate club activities after the US Supreme Court refused to step into a legal fight over recognition of a campus LGBTQ student group.

“Jefferson was an outlier among the founding generation, in terms of his views of traditional religious belief and his understanding of what church-state separation should mean,” Richard Garnett, a University of Notre Dame law professor who focuses on freedoms of religion and speech, told The Post in an email.

Richard Garnett, Notre Dame professor of law and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State and Society, similarly agreed that the court this term, and in previous terms, has been involved in “doctrinal cleanup.”

City Journal

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law 91视频.

The historical test “will provide much needed clarity and consistency to an area of law that has been notoriously confused and inconsistent,” said Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard Garnett, who filed an amicus brief supporting the coach.

Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard W. Garnett, who wrote a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Kennedy, said on Monday that the high court's ruling will "provide much needed clarity and consistency" to an area of the law that has been "notoriously confused and inconsistent."

For Richard Garnett, Notre Dame professor of law and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State and Society, the ruling affirmed that public employees do not lose their right to religious expression in the public square.

“The court has made explicit what perhaps has been implicit for a while: that the Establishment Clause is not a justification for censoring religious speech in the name of avoiding endorsements,” said Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频.

The ruling “confirms that the First Amendment’s rule against establishments of religion is not an excuse for censoring religious expression,” said Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频. 

Audio

Richard Garnett, Law Professor at Notre Dame, joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to discuss freedom of religion and the separation of church and state.

Audio

Richard Garnett, a Professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses a divided Supreme Court decision strengthening religious rights by bolstering the rights of parents to use taxpayer funds for religious education. 

Richard Garnett is a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame and an associated scholar with the Religious Freedom Institute.

Audio

Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett says charter schools "are a gray area.... I am genuinely curious to see how the law of charter schools develops and whether we get to a point where a charter school is permitted to be as ...religiously imbued as a parochial school is. "

Deseret News

So does much of the ongoing tension over the establishment clause, says Richard Garnett, professor of law and political science at the University of Notre Dame.

Law360

Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor Richard Garnett noted that the plaintiffs in SFFA and Dobbs invoked similar arguments in saying that stare decisis, the principle establishing that prior decisions should be binding, should not be followed when the court feels that the precedential decision is "wrong."

Richard Garnett, founding director of Notre Dame Law’s Program on Church, State and Society and former clerk for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, co-authored an amicus brief for the Dobbs case in support of overturning Roe.

Richard Garnett, director of Notre Dame University’s Program on Church, State and Society, expressed skepticism that religious freedom challenges to abortion restrictions could prevail.

Richard Garnett, a Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist in 1996-97, wrote in a May 5 essay for Newsweek Magazine, that it is not yet clear who or what was the source of the leak, what were the leaker’s motives, whether the draft opinion reflects the court’s final decision or what will be the revelation’s electoral or political fallout in a midterm election year.

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Ft. Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame.

Sherif Girgis said he felt “kind of a gut punch” after the draft of a Supreme Court majority decision was leaked late on May 2... Richard W. Garnett, a Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist in 1996-096 said in a statement to Crux that for the court’s sake “we should all hope that the justices will not be swayed or influenced by such efforts” regardless of one’s views on the legal questions of the case.

Richard W. Garnett, law professor at the Notre Dame Law 91视频, said that if Roe and Casey are overruled, the matter of abortion regulation will shift to political and legislative contexts.

Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor Richard W Garnett, a supreme court expert who clerked for the late chief justice William Rehnquist during the 1996-97 term, says the leaking of the draft document represents a “gross betrayal of trust”.

“For an employee or member of the court to intentionally leak a draft opinion would be a gross betrayal of trust, particularly if the leak were an effort to advance partisan aims or to undermine the court’s work and legitimacy,” said Rick Garnett, a Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor who clerked for then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist during the 1996-97 term.

“It strikes me that if this leak was done with the intent of affecting justices’ behavior, it strikes me that whoever made that decision was really mistaken,” said Richard Garnett, a professor of freedom of speech, association and religion and constitutional law at Notre Dame.

The reasoning in the draft opinion is what one would expect from Justice Alito, a fierce critic of Roe and Casey, said Richard W. Garnett, a law professor at Notre Dame.

University of Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor Richard Garnett, formerly a clerk for the late conservative Chief Justice William Rehnquist, called it "very troubling that any employee or member of the court would violate what is a very clear rule about the confidentiality of the justices' deliberations."

WGN Radio

Audio

Professor Richard Garnett, Professor at the University of Notre Dame Law 91视频, joined WGN Radio’s Karen Conti to address the Supreme Court case regarding high school football coach Joseph Kennedy, in Washington, being fired for kneeling at the 50 yard line after every game and saying a prayer.

Audio

Richard Garnett, a Professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses the Supreme Court arguments in the case of the high school football coach fired for praying on the 50-yard line after games. 

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Ft. Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. Joseph Graziano is a student fellow in the Notre Dame Law 91视频 Religious Liberty Initiative.

Richard Garnett, Notre Dame professor of law and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State and Society, said he was encouraged to see many justices skeptical of the school district’s argument that it had to censor Coach Kennedy’s private prayer in order to avoid any appearance that it had ‘endorsed’ his religious beliefs.”

“It is a case about protecting all individuals’ right to speak freely – and to pray – in the public square,” Richard W. Garnett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, said in a statement.

“This is not a case about re-imposing prayer in public-school classrooms. Instead, it is a case about protecting all individuals’ right to speak freely — and to pray — in the public square,” said Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett.

Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard W. Garnett, who oversaw the filing of an amicus brief in support of Kennedy, said he hopes the justices clear up the current judicial confusion over what constitutes an "establishment" of religion in public schools.

“It is a case about protecting all individuals’ right to speak freely – and to pray – in the public square,” Richard W. Garnett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, said in a statement.

"This is not a case about reimposing prayer in public school classrooms," said Richard Garnett, director of the Program on Church, State & Society at Notre Dame Law 91视频.

ABA Journal

Richard W. Garnett IV, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, helped write a brief in support of Kennedy that calls on the court to reexamine its “endorsement test,” which asks whether a reasonable observer would think the government was endorsing a particular religious message.

Public Discourse

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl / Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law, Concurrent Professor of Political Science, and Director of the Program on Church, State, and Society at the University of Notre Dame.

Courthouse News Service

Rick Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, authored an amicus brief cataloguing governments’ many recent efforts to squelch religious speech, including the University of Iowa deregistering religious student groups, Florida State University removing a member of the student senate for sharing religious views in text messages and a high school in Washington state that punished a football coach for praying on the field after games.

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame.

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. Olivia Rodgers is a 2L Law student at the Notre Dame Religious Liberty Initiative.

Audio

Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses the Supreme Court justices grappling with the religious rights of death-row inmates in the execution chamber.

"I will be interested in the聽extent to which the聽lawyers' arguments, and the justices' questions, wander from the precise, technical questions the聽court agreed to review," said Richard Garnett, who co-authored a brief in support of Mississippi in the Dobbs case.

Religious Freedom Institute

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame.

Indy Star

Rick Garnett, a聽law professor聽and聽Director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society, noted that聽neither public nor private institutions of higher education would聽be obligated to offer religious exemptions amid a general vaccine mandate, especially during a public health crisis.聽

The Indiana Lawyer

Richard Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频 and director of the Notre Dame Program on Church, State & Society, wrote in an email to Indiana Lawyer that 鈥渁ny challenges to regulations of abortion (that invoke federal claims, as opposed to state-law ones) are going to be kind of 鈥榦n hold鈥 until聽顿辞产产蝉听is decided. Or, if a lower court has to rule on such a challenge in the interim, any appeals will certainly depend on what the Court does in聽Dobbs.鈥

First Things

Richard W. Garnett is professor of law and concurrent professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame.

鈥淲e hear all the time about divisions and polarization and culture wars and all that stuff. But this is a 9-0 ruling in a case involving religion and gay rights. And that鈥檚 significant,鈥 says Richard Garnett, director of the Program on Church, State, and Society at the University of Notre Dame 91视频 of Law, referring to the foster parent case.

"It's been implicit in some of the things the court has聽been doing in recent years, especially in these COVID cases," said聽搁颈肠丑补谤诲听骋补谤苍别迟迟,聽director of the University of Notre Dame law school program on church, state and society.

"It is striking, and telling, that the court's more liberal justices joined the court's decision," said 搁颈肠丑补谤诲听骋补谤苍别迟迟,聽director of the University of Notre Dame law school program on church, state and society. "Today's ruling illustrates that respect for religious freedom should not be a partisan, or left-right issue."

Legal scholars disagree about what the scale of the decision鈥檚 impact might be. 鈥淭oday鈥檚 ruling is highly significant,鈥 said Notre Dame Law 91视频 Professor Richard Garnett聽in a statement, pointing out that it veered from three decades of decisions that tended to disfavor religious liberty.

Notre Dame聽law professor聽Richard Garnett聽predicted the ruling will not be so limited.

Richard Garnett, law school professor at the University of Notre Dame and director of the university鈥檚 Program on Church, State and Society, said the Supreme Court鈥檚聽 ruling will have a significant impact.

Richard W. Garnett is the Paul J. Schierl/Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame.

The Indiana Lawyer

鈥淲hether we think the founding fathers were right or not, they believed it was important for judicial power to be separate from legislative power and separate from executive power,鈥 said Richard Garnett, a professor at the University of Notre Dame Law 91视频.

The Deseret

Even that assessment slightly overstates the gap between liberals and conservatives, said Richard Garnett, director of the program on church, state and society at the University of Notre Dame.聽

Audio

Rick Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses a 9th Circuit decision that rejects the claims of a high school football coach that he had the right to pray at the 50-yard line immediately after his team鈥檚 games.聽

Do they聽accept the church鈥檚 views as authentic or interpret them as merely聽a way to provoke Christians, asked聽Richard Garnett, a professor at the University of Notre Dame Law 91视频 and director of the Program on Church, State and Society.聽

鈥淭he opinions we're seeing and the votes we're seeing in the shadow docket coronavirus and church closing cases suggest that in the Fulton case, the court is going to come out in favor of the Catholic adoption agency,鈥 said聽Richard Garnett,聽director of the University of Notre Dame law school program on church, state and society.

Audio

Rick Garnett, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses a divided U.S. Supreme Court ordering California to let indoor church services resume. Jimmy Gurule, a professor at Notre Dame Law 91视频, discusses the case for the second impeachment of former President Donald Trump.

Deseret News

Legal experts generally agreed that the phrase only applied to instances where someone was mistreated because of their biological sex, said Richard Garnett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, to the Deseret News in 2019.

Richard Garnett, professor of law at the University of Notre Dame Law 91视频, said Congress could take the fast track to impeachment.

Those sentiments were matched by Notre Dame Law 91视频 professor and the director of the Church, State and Society program, Rick Garnett, who compared Trump's efforts to the "tiresome election-questioning" by Hillary Clinton in 2016 and "all those who purported to believe that 'the Russians' manipulated vote-counts in 2016."

South Bend Tribune

Richard Garnett, director of the Church, State and Society program at Notre Dame Law 91视频 and a friend of Barrett鈥檚, said she sticks by legal principles in the face of political forces.